Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Yara Bakımında Kullanılan Yara Örtüsü Teknolojileri: Randomize Kontrollü Çalışmaların İncelenmesi

Year 2022, Issue: 16, 271 - 283, 30.04.2022

Mahmut Dağcı Deniz Öztekin

https://doi.org/10.38079/igusabder.996192

Abstract

Amaç: Bu derleme, son beş yılda en sık kullanılan modern yara bakım örtülerinin özelliklerinin ve yara iyileşmesine olan etkilerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla planlandı.
Yöntem: Anahtar kelime olarak, yara (wound) AND örtüsü (dressing) AND randomize (randomised) AND kontrollü (controlled) NOT sistematik (systematic) NOT derleme (review) NOT meta-analiz (meta-analysis) NOT olgu (case) NOT sunumu (report) kullanılarak, son beş yıla ait literatür MEDLINE, EMBASE ve CINAHL veri tabanlarında tarandı. Yapılan tarama sonucunda n=2734 araştırmaya ulaşıldı. Tekrarlı yayın kontrolü sonrasında n=45 araştırma elendi. Dahil edilme ve dışlanma kriterlerinin uygulanmasının ardından n=2570 araştırma dışı bırakıldı. Tam metnine ulaşılabilen n=10 randomize kontrollü araştırma, çalışmanın örneklemini oluşturdu. Verilere ulaşım tarihi: 13.01.2022’dir.
Bulgular: İncelenen araştırmaların çoğunluğunun 2017 yılında yapıldığı, yara örtüsü kullanılan araştırmalarda en çok diyabetik yaraların ele alındığı (n=4), yalnızca n=1 araştırmanın yönteminin çift kör planlandığı, n=7 araştırmada kullanılan yara örtülerinin iyileşmeye etkisi olduğu, n=3 araştırmada ise etkisi olmadığı bulundu.
Sonuç: Modern yara örtüleri (Hidrokolloid, aljinat, hidrofiber, amniyotik membran) yara iyileşmesini hızlandırmaktadır. Konu ile ilgili kanıt seviyesi yüksek orijinal araştırmaların ve meta-analiz çalışmaların yapılması önerilmektedir.

Keywords

Yara bakımı yara iyileşmesi yara örtüsü

References

  • Vogenberg FR, Santilli J. Healthcare trends for 2018. American Health & Drug Benefits. 2018;11(1):48-54.
  • World Health Organization. Global Health Expenditure Database. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/nha/database. Yayınlanma tarihi Eylül 2021. Erişim tarihi 13 Ocak 2022.
  • Dutta S, Lanvin B, Wunsch-Vincent S. The Global Innovation Index. In: Dutta S, Lanvin B, Wunsch-Vincent S, eds. Global Innovation Index 2020: Who Will Finance innovation? 13th ed. New York:2020:8. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2020.pdf. Erişim tarihi 13 Ocak 2022.
  • Madden M, Stark J. Understanding the development of advanced wound care in the UK: Interdisciplinary perspectives on care, cure and innovation. Journal of Tissue Viability. 2019;28(2):107-114. doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2019.03.003.
  • Sood A, Granick MS, Tomaselli NL. Wound dressings and comparative effectiveness data. Advances in Wound Care. 2014;3(8):511-529. doi:10.1089/wound.2012.0401.
  • Rezvani GE, Khalili S, Nouri KS, Esmaeely NR, Ramakrishna, S. Wound dressings: current advances and future directions. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2019;136(27): 47738. doi:10.1002/app.47738.
  • Silva JR, Burger B, Kühl C, Candreva T, Dos Anjos MB, Rodrigues HG. Wound healing and omega-6 fatty acids: from inflammation to repair. Mediators of Inflammation. 2018;(Special Issue):1-17. doi:10.1155/2018/2503950.
  • Monaro S, Pinkova J, Ko N, Stromsmoe N, Gullick J. Chronic wound care delivery in wound clinics, community nursing and residential aged care settings: a qualitative analysis using Levine’s Conservation Model. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2021;30(9-10):1295-1311. doi:10.1111/jocn.15674.
  • Blackburn J, Ousey K, Stephenson J. Nurses’ education, confidence, and competence in appropriate dressing choice. Advances in Skin & Wound Care. 2019;32(10):470-476. doi:10.1097/01.asw.0000577132.81124.88.
  • Görgülü RS. Hemşireler İçin Fiziksel Muayene Yöntemleri. İstanbul Tıp Kitabevi; 2014.
  • Welsh L. Wound care evidence, knowledge and education amongst nurses: a semi‐systematic literature review. International Wound Journal. 2018;15(1):53-61. doi:10.1111/iwj.12822.
  • Lei J, Sun L, Li P, et al. The wound dressings and their applications in wound healing and management. Health Science Journal. 2019;13(4):1-8. doi:10.36648/1791-809X.1000662.
  • Shi C, Wang C, Liu H, et al. Selection of appropriate wound dressing for various wounds. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2020;8:1-8. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00182.
  • Rando T, Kang AC, Guerin M, Boylan J, Dyer A. Simplifying wound dressing selection for residential aged care. Journal of Wound Care. 2018;27(8):504-511. doi:10.12968/jowc.2018.27.8.504.
  • Luo Z, Jiang L, Xu C, et al. Engineered janus amphipathic polymeric fiber films with unidirectional drainage and anti-adhesion abilities to accelerate wound healing. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2021;42(2):127725. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.127725.
  • Weller CD, Team V, Sussman G. First-line interactive wound dressing update: a comprehensive review of the evidence. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2020;11:155. doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.00155.
  • Kramer A, Dissemond J, Kim S, et al. Consensus on wound antisepsis: update 2018. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology. 2018;31(1):28-58. doi:10.1159/000481545.
  • Sorg H, Tilkorn DJ, Hager S, Hauser J, Mirastschijski U. Skin wound healing: an update on the current knowledge and concepts. European Surgical Research. 2017;58:81-94. doi:10.1159/000454919.
  • Deutsch CJ, Edwards DM, Myers S. Wound dressings. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2017;78(7):103-109. doi:10.12968/hmed.2017.78.7.C103.
  • Hasatsri S, Pitiratanaworanat A, Swangwit S, Boochakul C, Tragoonsupachai C. Comparison of the morphological and physical properties of different absorbent wound dressings. Dermatology Research and Practice. 2018;2018:1-6. doi:10.1155/2018/9367034.
  • Probst SD, Seppänen SM, Gerber V, Hopkins A, Rimdeika RM, Gethin G. EWMA Document: home care-wound care: overview, challenges and perspectives. Journal of Wound Care. 2014;23:1-41. doi:10.12968/jowc.2014.23.sup5a.s1.
  • Powers JG, Higham C, Broussard K, Phillips TJ. Wound healing and treating wounds: chronic wound care and management. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2016;74(4):607-625. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.08.070.
  • Boga SM. Nursing practices in the prevention of post-operative wound infection in accordance with evidence-based approach. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2019;12(2):1228-35.
  • Edwards HE, Chang AM, Gibb M, Finlayson KJ, Parker C, O'Reilly M. Reduced prevalence and severity of wounds following implementation of the champions for skin integrity model to facilitate uptake of evidence‐based practice in aged care. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2017;26(23-24):4276-85. doi:10.1111/jocn.13752.
  • Essa MS, Ahmad KS, Zayed ME, Ibrahim SG. Comparative study between silver nanoparticles dressing (SilvrSTAT Gel) and conventional dressing in diabetic foot ulcer healing: a prospective randomized study. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. 2021;1534734620988217. doi: 10.1177/1534734620988217.
  • Mecott GA, González-Cantú I, Dorsey-Treviño EG, et al. Efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in patients with second-degree burns: a proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial. Advances in Skin & Wound Care. 2020;33(4):1-7. doi:10.1097/01.ASW.0000655484.95155.f7.
  • Lee YJ, Kim JY, Shin WY. Use of prophylactic silicone adhesive dressings for maintaining skin integrity in intensive care unit patients: a randomised controlled trial. International Wound Journal. 2019;16(Suppl. 1): 36-42. doi:10.1111/iwj.13028.
  • DiDomenico LA, Orgill DP, Galiano RD, et al. Use of an aseptically processed, dehydrated human amnion and chorion membrane improves likelihood and rate of healing in chronic diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective, randomised, multi‐centre clinical trial in 80 patients. International Wound Journal. 2018;15(6):950-957. doi:10.1111/iwj.12954.
  • Edmonds M, Lázaro-Martínez JL, Alfayate-García JM, et al. Sucrose octasulfate dressing versus control dressing in patients with neuroischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (explorer): An international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2018; 6(3):186-196. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30438-2.
  • Meekul J, Chotirosniramit A, Himakalasa W, et al. A randomized controlled trial on the outcome in comparing an alginate silver dressing with a conventional treatment of a necrotizing fasciitis wound. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. 2017;16(2):108-113. doi:10.1177/1534734617701051.
  • León AH, Hebal F, Stake C, Baldwin K, Barsness KA. Prevention of hypergranulation tissue after gastrostomy tube placement: a randomised controlled trial of hydrocolloid dressings. International Wound Journal. 2019;16(1):41-46. doi:10.1111/iwj. 12978.
  • Tsang KK, Kwong EWY, To TSS, Chung JWY, Wong TKS. A pilot randomized, controlled study of nanocrystalline silver, manuka honey, and conventional dressing in healing diabetic foot ulcer. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2017:1-15. doi:10.1155/2017/5294890.
  • Bianchi C, Cazzell S, Vayser D, Reyzelman AM, Dosluoglu H, Tovmassian G. A multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (EpiFix®) allograft for the treatment of venous leg ulcers. International Wound Journal. 2018;15(1):114-122. doi:10.1111/iwj.12843.
  • David F, Wurtz JL, Breton N, Bisch O, Gazeu P, Kerihuel, JC. A randomised, controlled, non‐inferiority trial comparing the performance of a soft silicone‐coated wound contact layer (Mepitel One) with a lipidocolloid wound contact layer (UrgoTul) in the treatment of acute wounds. International Wound Journal. 2018;15(1):159-69. doi:10.1111/iwj.12853.
  • Meuleneire F. Management of diabetic foot ulcers using dressings with Safetac: a review of case studies. Wounds UK. 2008;4(4):16-30.
  • Peleg D, Eberstark E, Warsof SL, Cohen N, Shachar IB. Early wound dressing removal after scheduled cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;215(3):388.e1-e5. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.035.
  • Ousey K, Rogers AA, Rippon MG. Hydro-responsive wound dressings simplify TIME wound management framework. British Journal of Community Nursing. 2016;21(Sup12):39-49. doi:10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.Sup12.S39.
  • Tottoli EM, Dorati R, Genta I, Chiesa E, Pisani S, Conti B. Skin wound healing process and new emerging technologies for skin wound care and regeneration. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(8):735. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12080735.
  • Totty JP, Bua N, Smith GE, et al. Dialkylcarbamoyl chloride (DACC)-coated dressings in the management and prevention of wound infection: a systematic review. Journal of Wound Care. 2017;26(3):107-114. doi:10.12968/jowc.2017.26.3.107.
  • Erdoğan S, Nahcivan N, Esin MN. Hemşirelikte Araştırma: Süreç, Uygulama ve Kritik. 3. Baskı. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevi; 2017.
  • Chaby G, Senet P, Vaneau M, et al. Dressings for acute and chronic wounds: a systematic review. Archives of Dermatology. 2007;143(10):1297-1304. doi:10.1001/archderm.143.10.1297.
  • Bugeja L, Low JK, McGinnes RA, Team V, Sinha S, Weller C. Barriers and enablers to patient recruitment for randomised controlled trials on treatment of chronic wounds: a systematic review. International Wound Journal. 2018;15(6):880-892. doi:10.1111/iwj.12940.
  • Bekara F, Vitse J, Fluieraru S, et al. New techniques for wound management: a systematic review of their role in the management of chronic wounds. Archives of Plastic Surgery. 2018;45(2):102-110. doi:10.5999/aps.2016.02019.
  • Schaper NC, van Netten JJ, Apelqvist J, Bus SA, Hinchliffe RJ, Lipsky BA, IWGDF Editorial Board. Practical guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes/metabolism Research and Reviews. 2020;36 Suppl 1:e3266. doi:10.1002/dmrr.3266.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes statistics report, 2020. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services, 12-15. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-statistics-report.pdf Erişim tarihi 13 Ocak 2022.
  • Nair H, Venkateshwaran N, Seetharaman SS, Deng W, Uthaipaisanwong A, Galea E. Benefits of sucrose octasulfate (TLC-NOSF) dressings in the treatment of chronic wounds: a systematic review. Journal of Wound Care. 2021;30(Sup4):42-52. doi:10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup4.S42.
  • Wen J, Jin X, Al Sayah F, Johnson JA, Paulden M, Ohinmaa A. Economic evaluation of sucrose octasulfate dressing for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers for type 2 diabetes patients. Canadian Journal of Diabetes. 2021;45(8):734-742. doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.07.001.
  • Davis JW. Skin transplantation with a review of 550 cases at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Johns Hopkins Medical Journal. 1910;15:307. doi:10.1097/00000658-190909000-00022.
  • Gönüllü N. Laparoskopik ventral fıtık cerrahisinde komplikasyonlar ve önlenmesi. Endoskopik Laparoskopik & Minimal İnvaziv Cerrahi Dergisi. 2011;18(3):168-173.
  • Dietz UA, Menzel S, Lock J, Wiegering, A. The treatment of incisional hernia. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2018;115(3):31-7. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2018.0031.
  • Barski D, Gerullis H, Ecke T, et al. Human amniotic membrane dressing for the treatment of an infected wound due to an entero-cutaneous fistula: case report. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 2018;51:11-3. doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.08.015.

Dressing Technologies Used in Wound Care: Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Year 2022, Issue: 16, 271 - 283, 30.04.2022

Mahmut Dağcı Deniz Öztekin

https://doi.org/10.38079/igusabder.996192

Abstract

Aim: This review was planned to determine the characteristics of the most frequently used modern wound dressings in the last five years and their effects on wound healing.
Method: The literature of the last five years was searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases, using wound AND dressing AND randomized AND controlled NOT systematic NOT review NOT meta-analysis NOT case NOT report as a keyword. As a result of the scanning n=2734, the research was reached. After duplication control n=45, the study was eliminated. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria n=2570 researches were excluded from the study. Randomized controlled research, whose full text is available n=10 were the sample of the study. The last data access date: 13.01.2022.
Results: Most of the studies examined were conducted in 2017, most of the studies in which wound dressings were used were focused on diabetic wounds n=4, only n=1 the method of the study was double-blinded, n=7 the wound dressings used in the study had an effect on healing, n=3 it was found to have no effect in the study.
Conclusion: Modern wound dressings (hydrocolloid, alginate, hydrofiber, amniotic membrane) accelerate wound healing. It is recommended to carry out original researches and meta-analysis studies with high level of evidence on the subject.

Keywords

Wound care wound healing wound dressing.

References

  • Vogenberg FR, Santilli J. Healthcare trends for 2018. American Health & Drug Benefits. 2018;11(1):48-54.
  • World Health Organization. Global Health Expenditure Database. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/nha/database. Yayınlanma tarihi Eylül 2021. Erişim tarihi 13 Ocak 2022.
  • Dutta S, Lanvin B, Wunsch-Vincent S. The Global Innovation Index. In: Dutta S, Lanvin B, Wunsch-Vincent S, eds. Global Innovation Index 2020: Who Will Finance innovation? 13th ed. New York:2020:8. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2020.pdf. Erişim tarihi 13 Ocak 2022.
  • Madden M, Stark J. Understanding the development of advanced wound care in the UK: Interdisciplinary perspectives on care, cure and innovation. Journal of Tissue Viability. 2019;28(2):107-114. doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2019.03.003.
  • Sood A, Granick MS, Tomaselli NL. Wound dressings and comparative effectiveness data. Advances in Wound Care. 2014;3(8):511-529. doi:10.1089/wound.2012.0401.
  • Rezvani GE, Khalili S, Nouri KS, Esmaeely NR, Ramakrishna, S. Wound dressings: current advances and future directions. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2019;136(27): 47738. doi:10.1002/app.47738.
  • Silva JR, Burger B, Kühl C, Candreva T, Dos Anjos MB, Rodrigues HG. Wound healing and omega-6 fatty acids: from inflammation to repair. Mediators of Inflammation. 2018;(Special Issue):1-17. doi:10.1155/2018/2503950.
  • Monaro S, Pinkova J, Ko N, Stromsmoe N, Gullick J. Chronic wound care delivery in wound clinics, community nursing and residential aged care settings: a qualitative analysis using Levine’s Conservation Model. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2021;30(9-10):1295-1311. doi:10.1111/jocn.15674.
  • Blackburn J, Ousey K, Stephenson J. Nurses’ education, confidence, and competence in appropriate dressing choice. Advances in Skin & Wound Care. 2019;32(10):470-476. doi:10.1097/01.asw.0000577132.81124.88.
  • Görgülü RS. Hemşireler İçin Fiziksel Muayene Yöntemleri. İstanbul Tıp Kitabevi; 2014.
  • Welsh L. Wound care evidence, knowledge and education amongst nurses: a semi‐systematic literature review. International Wound Journal. 2018;15(1):53-61. doi:10.1111/iwj.12822.
  • Lei J, Sun L, Li P, et al. The wound dressings and their applications in wound healing and management. Health Science Journal. 2019;13(4):1-8. doi:10.36648/1791-809X.1000662.
  • Shi C, Wang C, Liu H, et al. Selection of appropriate wound dressing for various wounds. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2020;8:1-8. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00182.
  • Rando T, Kang AC, Guerin M, Boylan J, Dyer A. Simplifying wound dressing selection for residential aged care. Journal of Wound Care. 2018;27(8):504-511. doi:10.12968/jowc.2018.27.8.504.
  • Luo Z, Jiang L, Xu C, et al. Engineered janus amphipathic polymeric fiber films with unidirectional drainage and anti-adhesion abilities to accelerate wound healing. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2021;42(2):127725. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.127725.
  • Weller CD, Team V, Sussman G. First-line interactive wound dressing update: a comprehensive review of the evidence. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2020;11:155. doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.00155.
  • Kramer A, Dissemond J, Kim S, et al. Consensus on wound antisepsis: update 2018. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology. 2018;31(1):28-58. doi:10.1159/000481545.
  • Sorg H, Tilkorn DJ, Hager S, Hauser J, Mirastschijski U. Skin wound healing: an update on the current knowledge and concepts. European Surgical Research. 2017;58:81-94. doi:10.1159/000454919.
  • Deutsch CJ, Edwards DM, Myers S. Wound dressings. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2017;78(7):103-109. doi:10.12968/hmed.2017.78.7.C103.
  • Hasatsri S, Pitiratanaworanat A, Swangwit S, Boochakul C, Tragoonsupachai C. Comparison of the morphological and physical properties of different absorbent wound dressings. Dermatology Research and Practice. 2018;2018:1-6. doi:10.1155/2018/9367034.
  • Probst SD, Seppänen SM, Gerber V, Hopkins A, Rimdeika RM, Gethin G. EWMA Document: home care-wound care: overview, challenges and perspectives. Journal of Wound Care. 2014;23:1-41. doi:10.12968/jowc.2014.23.sup5a.s1.
  • Powers JG, Higham C, Broussard K, Phillips TJ. Wound healing and treating wounds: chronic wound care and management. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2016;74(4):607-625. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.08.070.
  • Boga SM. Nursing practices in the prevention of post-operative wound infection in accordance with evidence-based approach. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2019;12(2):1228-35.
  • Edwards HE, Chang AM, Gibb M, Finlayson KJ, Parker C, O'Reilly M. Reduced prevalence and severity of wounds following implementation of the champions for skin integrity model to facilitate uptake of evidence‐based practice in aged care. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2017;26(23-24):4276-85. doi:10.1111/jocn.13752.
  • Essa MS, Ahmad KS, Zayed ME, Ibrahim SG. Comparative study between silver nanoparticles dressing (SilvrSTAT Gel) and conventional dressing in diabetic foot ulcer healing: a prospective randomized study. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. 2021;1534734620988217. doi: 10.1177/1534734620988217.
  • Mecott GA, González-Cantú I, Dorsey-Treviño EG, et al. Efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in patients with second-degree burns: a proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial. Advances in Skin & Wound Care. 2020;33(4):1-7. doi:10.1097/01.ASW.0000655484.95155.f7.
  • Lee YJ, Kim JY, Shin WY. Use of prophylactic silicone adhesive dressings for maintaining skin integrity in intensive care unit patients: a randomised controlled trial. International Wound Journal. 2019;16(Suppl. 1): 36-42. doi:10.1111/iwj.13028.
  • DiDomenico LA, Orgill DP, Galiano RD, et al. Use of an aseptically processed, dehydrated human amnion and chorion membrane improves likelihood and rate of healing in chronic diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective, randomised, multi‐centre clinical trial in 80 patients. International Wound Journal. 2018;15(6):950-957. doi:10.1111/iwj.12954.
  • Edmonds M, Lázaro-Martínez JL, Alfayate-García JM, et al. Sucrose octasulfate dressing versus control dressing in patients with neuroischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (explorer): An international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2018; 6(3):186-196. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30438-2.
  • Meekul J, Chotirosniramit A, Himakalasa W, et al. A randomized controlled trial on the outcome in comparing an alginate silver dressing with a conventional treatment of a necrotizing fasciitis wound. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. 2017;16(2):108-113. doi:10.1177/1534734617701051.
  • León AH, Hebal F, Stake C, Baldwin K, Barsness KA. Prevention of hypergranulation tissue after gastrostomy tube placement: a randomised controlled trial of hydrocolloid dressings. International Wound Journal. 2019;16(1):41-46. doi:10.1111/iwj. 12978.
  • Tsang KK, Kwong EWY, To TSS, Chung JWY, Wong TKS. A pilot randomized, controlled study of nanocrystalline silver, manuka honey, and conventional dressing in healing diabetic foot ulcer. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2017:1-15. doi:10.1155/2017/5294890.
  • Bianchi C, Cazzell S, Vayser D, Reyzelman AM, Dosluoglu H, Tovmassian G. A multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (EpiFix®) allograft for the treatment of venous leg ulcers. International Wound Journal. 2018;15(1):114-122. doi:10.1111/iwj.12843.
  • David F, Wurtz JL, Breton N, Bisch O, Gazeu P, Kerihuel, JC. A randomised, controlled, non‐inferiority trial comparing the performance of a soft silicone‐coated wound contact layer (Mepitel One) with a lipidocolloid wound contact layer (UrgoTul) in the treatment of acute wounds. International Wound Journal. 2018;15(1):159-69. doi:10.1111/iwj.12853.
  • Meuleneire F. Management of diabetic foot ulcers using dressings with Safetac: a review of case studies. Wounds UK. 2008;4(4):16-30.
  • Peleg D, Eberstark E, Warsof SL, Cohen N, Shachar IB. Early wound dressing removal after scheduled cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;215(3):388.e1-e5. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.035.
  • Ousey K, Rogers AA, Rippon MG. Hydro-responsive wound dressings simplify TIME wound management framework. British Journal of Community Nursing. 2016;21(Sup12):39-49. doi:10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.Sup12.S39.
  • Tottoli EM, Dorati R, Genta I, Chiesa E, Pisani S, Conti B. Skin wound healing process and new emerging technologies for skin wound care and regeneration. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(8):735. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12080735.
  • Totty JP, Bua N, Smith GE, et al. Dialkylcarbamoyl chloride (DACC)-coated dressings in the management and prevention of wound infection: a systematic review. Journal of Wound Care. 2017;26(3):107-114. doi:10.12968/jowc.2017.26.3.107.
  • Erdoğan S, Nahcivan N, Esin MN. Hemşirelikte Araştırma: Süreç, Uygulama ve Kritik. 3. Baskı. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevi; 2017.
  • Chaby G, Senet P, Vaneau M, et al. Dressings for acute and chronic wounds: a systematic review. Archives of Dermatology. 2007;143(10):1297-1304. doi:10.1001/archderm.143.10.1297.
  • Bugeja L, Low JK, McGinnes RA, Team V, Sinha S, Weller C. Barriers and enablers to patient recruitment for randomised controlled trials on treatment of chronic wounds: a systematic review. International Wound Journal. 2018;15(6):880-892. doi:10.1111/iwj.12940.
  • Bekara F, Vitse J, Fluieraru S, et al. New techniques for wound management: a systematic review of their role in the management of chronic wounds. Archives of Plastic Surgery. 2018;45(2):102-110. doi:10.5999/aps.2016.02019.
  • Schaper NC, van Netten JJ, Apelqvist J, Bus SA, Hinchliffe RJ, Lipsky BA, IWGDF Editorial Board. Practical guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes/metabolism Research and Reviews. 2020;36 Suppl 1:e3266. doi:10.1002/dmrr.3266.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes statistics report, 2020. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services, 12-15. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-statistics-report.pdf Erişim tarihi 13 Ocak 2022.
  • Nair H, Venkateshwaran N, Seetharaman SS, Deng W, Uthaipaisanwong A, Galea E. Benefits of sucrose octasulfate (TLC-NOSF) dressings in the treatment of chronic wounds: a systematic review. Journal of Wound Care. 2021;30(Sup4):42-52. doi:10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup4.S42.
  • Wen J, Jin X, Al Sayah F, Johnson JA, Paulden M, Ohinmaa A. Economic evaluation of sucrose octasulfate dressing for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers for type 2 diabetes patients. Canadian Journal of Diabetes. 2021;45(8):734-742. doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.07.001.
  • Davis JW. Skin transplantation with a review of 550 cases at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Johns Hopkins Medical Journal. 1910;15:307. doi:10.1097/00000658-190909000-00022.
  • Gönüllü N. Laparoskopik ventral fıtık cerrahisinde komplikasyonlar ve önlenmesi. Endoskopik Laparoskopik & Minimal İnvaziv Cerrahi Dergisi. 2011;18(3):168-173.
  • Dietz UA, Menzel S, Lock J, Wiegering, A. The treatment of incisional hernia. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2018;115(3):31-7. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2018.0031.
  • Barski D, Gerullis H, Ecke T, et al. Human amniotic membrane dressing for the treatment of an infected wound due to an entero-cutaneous fistula: case report. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 2018;51:11-3. doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.08.015.
There are 51 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Clinical Sciences
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mahmut Dağcı 0000-0003-0883-9129

Deniz Öztekin 0000-0001-5215-7913

Publication Date April 30, 2022
Acceptance Date April 7, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Issue: 16

Cite

APA Dağcı, M., & Öztekin, D. (2022). Yara Bakımında Kullanılan Yara Örtüsü Teknolojileri: Randomize Kontrollü Çalışmaların İncelenmesi. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi(16), 271-283. https://doi.org/10.38079/igusabder.996192
AMA Dağcı M, Öztekin D. Yara Bakımında Kullanılan Yara Örtüsü Teknolojileri: Randomize Kontrollü Çalışmaların İncelenmesi. IGUSABDER. April 2022;(16):271-283. doi:10.38079/igusabder.996192
Chicago Dağcı, Mahmut, and Deniz Öztekin. “Yara Bakımında Kullanılan Yara Örtüsü Teknolojileri: Randomize Kontrollü Çalışmaların İncelenmesi”. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, no. 16 (April 2022): 271-83. https://doi.org/10.38079/igusabder.996192.
EndNote Dağcı M, Öztekin D (April 1, 2022) Yara Bakımında Kullanılan Yara Örtüsü Teknolojileri: Randomize Kontrollü Çalışmaların İncelenmesi. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 16 271–283.
IEEE M. Dağcı and D. Öztekin, “Yara Bakımında Kullanılan Yara Örtüsü Teknolojileri: Randomize Kontrollü Çalışmaların İncelenmesi”, IGUSABDER, no. 16, pp. 271–283, April 2022, doi: 10.38079/igusabder.996192.
ISNAD Dağcı, Mahmut - Öztekin, Deniz. “Yara Bakımında Kullanılan Yara Örtüsü Teknolojileri: Randomize Kontrollü Çalışmaların İncelenmesi”. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 16 (April 2022), 271-283. https://doi.org/10.38079/igusabder.996192.
JAMA Dağcı M, Öztekin D. Yara Bakımında Kullanılan Yara Örtüsü Teknolojileri: Randomize Kontrollü Çalışmaların İncelenmesi. IGUSABDER. 2022;:271–283.
MLA Dağcı, Mahmut and Deniz Öztekin. “Yara Bakımında Kullanılan Yara Örtüsü Teknolojileri: Randomize Kontrollü Çalışmaların İncelenmesi”. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, no. 16, 2022, pp. 271-83, doi:10.38079/igusabder.996192.
Vancouver Dağcı M, Öztekin D. Yara Bakımında Kullanılan Yara Örtüsü Teknolojileri: Randomize Kontrollü Çalışmaların İncelenmesi. IGUSABDER. 2022(16):271-83.
 Download Cover Image

 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)