Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2017, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 400 - 409, 30.09.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.717

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Ahmadi, H., Bagheri, F., Ebrahimi, SA., Rokni, MAN., Kahreh, MS. 2011, “Deviant Work Behavior: Explaining Relationship between Organizational Justice and Cyber-Loafing as a Deviant Work Behavior”, American Journal of Scientific Research, 24,pp.103-116.
  • Blanchard, A. L. & Henle, CA. 2008, “Correlates of Different Forms of Cyberloafing: The Role of Norms and External Locus of Control”, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.24, no.3, pp. 1067-1084.
  • Bies, R.J., Moag, J.S. 1986, “Interactional justice: Commu-nication criteria of fairness”. In R. J. Lewicki, B H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations,, pp. 43-55.
  • Colquitt, J. A., & Chertkoff, J. M. 2002, “Explaining injustice: The Interactive Effect of Explanation and Outcome on Fairness Perceptions and Task Motivation”, Journal of Management, vol.28, no. 5, pp. 591-610.
  • Cropanzano R. and Greenberg J. 1997, Chapter to appear in C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.). Iptematjonal Review of Industrial and Orpnizational Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Eivazi, K. 2011, “Computer Use Monitoring and Privacy at Work”, Computer Law & Security Review, vol.27, no.5, pp. 516-523.
  • Forret, M. & Love, M. S. 2008, “Employee Justice Perception and Coworker Relationship”. Leaderships & Organization Development, vol.29, no. 3, pp.248-260.
  • Greenberg, J. 1990, “Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow”, Journal of management, vol.16, no. 2, pp.399-432.
  • İnce, M. & Gül, H. 2011, “The Relation of Cyber Slacking Behaviors with Various Organizational Outputs: Example of Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University”, European Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 52, , no. 4, pp.507-527.
  • İşcan, Ö. F. & Sayın, U. 2010, “Örgütsel Adalet, İş Tatmini ve Örgütsel Güven Arasındaki İlişki”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, vol.24, , no. 4, pp. 195‐216.
  • Kaplan M. & Çetinkaya A.Ş 2014, “Sanal Kaytarma ve Demografik Özellikler Açısından Farklılıklar: Otel İşletmelerinde Bir Araştırma”, Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol.25, no. 1, pp.26 – 34.
  • Kaplan, M. & Öğüt, A. 2012, “Algılanan Örgütsel Adalet İle Sanal Kaytarma Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi: Hastane Çalışanları Örneği”, İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.13, no. 1, pp. 1-13.
  • Keklik, B., Kılıç, R., Yıldız, H., & Yıldız, B. 2015, “Sanal Kaytarma Davranışlarının Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi/An Investigation of the Effect of Cyberloafing Behaviors on Organizational Learning Capacity”, Business and Economics Research Journal, vol.6, no. 3, pp. 129-144.
  • Kim, S. J. & Byrne, S. 2011, “Conceptualizing Personal Web Usage in Work Contexts: A Preliminary Framework”, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.27, no. 6, pp. 2271-2283.
  • Lim, V. K. G. 2002, “The IT Way of Loafing on the Job: Cyberloafing, Neutralizing and Organizational Justice”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, pp. 675-694.
  • Lim, V. K., & Chen, D. J. 2012, “Cyberloafing at the workplace: gain or drain on work?”, Behaviour & Information Technology, vol.31, no. 4, pp. 343-353.
  • Nowakowski, J,M . & Conlon D, E. 2005, “Organizational Justice: Looking Back, Looking Forward”, The International Journal of Conflict Management, vol.16, no.1, pp. 4–29.
  • Niehoff, B.P. & Moorman, R.H. 1993, “Justice As a Mediator of the Relationship between Methods of Monitoring and Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 36, no.3, pp. 527-556.
  • Örücü, E. & Yıldız, H. 2014, “İşyerinde Kişisel İnternet ve Teknoloji Kullanımı: Sanal Kaytarma”, Ege Akademik Bakış, vol.14, no.1, pp. 99-114.
  • Özkalp, E., Aydın, U. & Tekeli, S. 2012, “Sapkın Örgütsel Davranışlar ve Çalışma Yaşamında Yeni Bir Olgu: Sanal Kaytarma (Cyberloafing) ve İş İlişkilerine Etkileri”, Çimento İşveren Sendikası Dergisi, vol.26, no.2, pp. 18-33.
  • Richardson, K. & Benbunan-Fich, R. 2011, “Examining the Antecedents of Work Connectivity Behavior during No-Work Time”, Information and Organization, vol.21, no.3, pp. 142-160.
  • Syaebani, M. I. & Sobri, R. R. 2011, “Relationship between Organizational Justice Perception and Engagement in Deviant Workplace Behavior”, The South East Asian Journal Management, vol. 5, no. 1, pp.37-49.
  • Weatherbee, T. G. 2010, “Counterproductive Use of Technology at Work: Information & Communications Technologies and Cyberdeviancy”, Human Resource Management Review, vol.20, no. 1, pp.35-44.
  • Whitty, M. T. & Carr, A. N. 2006, “New Rules in the Workplace: Applying Object-Relations Theory to Explain Problem Internet and Email Behavior in the Workplace”, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.22, no. 2, pp. 235-250.
  • Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). Hane halkı Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanım Araştırması, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=21779 (Erişim Tarihi, 03 Haziran 2017).
  • Yavuz, E. 2010, “Kamu ve özel sektör çalışanlarının örgütsel adalet algılamaları üzerine bir karşılaştırma çalışması”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, vol.11, no.2, pp.302-312.
  • Yıldız H., Yıldız B. &Ateş H. 2015, “Sanal Kaytarma Davranışlarının Sergirilmesinde Örgütsel Adalet Algısının Rolü Var mıdır?”, Bilgi, Ekonomi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, vol.X , no.II, pp..55-66.
  • Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P. 2007, “Relationship between Organizational Justice and Cyberloafing in the Workplace: Has “Anomia” a Say in the Matter?”, CyberPsychology& Behavior, vol. 10(3), pp. 464-470.
  • Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P. & Melián-González, S. 2009, “The Role of Anomia on the Relationship between Organisational Justice Perceptions and Organisational Citizenship Online Behaviours, Journal of Information”, Communication and Ethics in Society , vol.7, no.1, pp. 72-85.

THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 400 - 409, 30.09.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.717

Öz

Purpose- The aim of
this study is to determine the effects of organizational justice perception on
cyber-loafing behaviors.

Method - Data were
collected  (233) from health care workers
who agreed to participate in the study using the questionnaire method.

These 233
health workers are working in Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology
(Cumhuriyet University Health Services Research and Implementation Hospital,
Sivas Numune Hospital) and Family Health Centers in the city center of Sivas.
The data were analyzed by SPSS 22.0 program with percentile distribution,
Pearson correlation and multiple regression analysis.

Findings- In the study was determined the negative effect of the
operational justice dimension on insignificant cyber-loafing. Moreover, it has
been determined that the dimension of interactionel justice has a positive
effect on insignificant cyber-loafing behavior.









Conclusion- Positive or negative perception of organizational
justice does not cause an increase or decrease in important cyber-loafing
behaviors. 

Kaynakça

  • Ahmadi, H., Bagheri, F., Ebrahimi, SA., Rokni, MAN., Kahreh, MS. 2011, “Deviant Work Behavior: Explaining Relationship between Organizational Justice and Cyber-Loafing as a Deviant Work Behavior”, American Journal of Scientific Research, 24,pp.103-116.
  • Blanchard, A. L. & Henle, CA. 2008, “Correlates of Different Forms of Cyberloafing: The Role of Norms and External Locus of Control”, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.24, no.3, pp. 1067-1084.
  • Bies, R.J., Moag, J.S. 1986, “Interactional justice: Commu-nication criteria of fairness”. In R. J. Lewicki, B H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations,, pp. 43-55.
  • Colquitt, J. A., & Chertkoff, J. M. 2002, “Explaining injustice: The Interactive Effect of Explanation and Outcome on Fairness Perceptions and Task Motivation”, Journal of Management, vol.28, no. 5, pp. 591-610.
  • Cropanzano R. and Greenberg J. 1997, Chapter to appear in C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.). Iptematjonal Review of Industrial and Orpnizational Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Eivazi, K. 2011, “Computer Use Monitoring and Privacy at Work”, Computer Law & Security Review, vol.27, no.5, pp. 516-523.
  • Forret, M. & Love, M. S. 2008, “Employee Justice Perception and Coworker Relationship”. Leaderships & Organization Development, vol.29, no. 3, pp.248-260.
  • Greenberg, J. 1990, “Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow”, Journal of management, vol.16, no. 2, pp.399-432.
  • İnce, M. & Gül, H. 2011, “The Relation of Cyber Slacking Behaviors with Various Organizational Outputs: Example of Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University”, European Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 52, , no. 4, pp.507-527.
  • İşcan, Ö. F. & Sayın, U. 2010, “Örgütsel Adalet, İş Tatmini ve Örgütsel Güven Arasındaki İlişki”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, vol.24, , no. 4, pp. 195‐216.
  • Kaplan M. & Çetinkaya A.Ş 2014, “Sanal Kaytarma ve Demografik Özellikler Açısından Farklılıklar: Otel İşletmelerinde Bir Araştırma”, Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol.25, no. 1, pp.26 – 34.
  • Kaplan, M. & Öğüt, A. 2012, “Algılanan Örgütsel Adalet İle Sanal Kaytarma Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi: Hastane Çalışanları Örneği”, İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.13, no. 1, pp. 1-13.
  • Keklik, B., Kılıç, R., Yıldız, H., & Yıldız, B. 2015, “Sanal Kaytarma Davranışlarının Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi/An Investigation of the Effect of Cyberloafing Behaviors on Organizational Learning Capacity”, Business and Economics Research Journal, vol.6, no. 3, pp. 129-144.
  • Kim, S. J. & Byrne, S. 2011, “Conceptualizing Personal Web Usage in Work Contexts: A Preliminary Framework”, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.27, no. 6, pp. 2271-2283.
  • Lim, V. K. G. 2002, “The IT Way of Loafing on the Job: Cyberloafing, Neutralizing and Organizational Justice”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, pp. 675-694.
  • Lim, V. K., & Chen, D. J. 2012, “Cyberloafing at the workplace: gain or drain on work?”, Behaviour & Information Technology, vol.31, no. 4, pp. 343-353.
  • Nowakowski, J,M . & Conlon D, E. 2005, “Organizational Justice: Looking Back, Looking Forward”, The International Journal of Conflict Management, vol.16, no.1, pp. 4–29.
  • Niehoff, B.P. & Moorman, R.H. 1993, “Justice As a Mediator of the Relationship between Methods of Monitoring and Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 36, no.3, pp. 527-556.
  • Örücü, E. & Yıldız, H. 2014, “İşyerinde Kişisel İnternet ve Teknoloji Kullanımı: Sanal Kaytarma”, Ege Akademik Bakış, vol.14, no.1, pp. 99-114.
  • Özkalp, E., Aydın, U. & Tekeli, S. 2012, “Sapkın Örgütsel Davranışlar ve Çalışma Yaşamında Yeni Bir Olgu: Sanal Kaytarma (Cyberloafing) ve İş İlişkilerine Etkileri”, Çimento İşveren Sendikası Dergisi, vol.26, no.2, pp. 18-33.
  • Richardson, K. & Benbunan-Fich, R. 2011, “Examining the Antecedents of Work Connectivity Behavior during No-Work Time”, Information and Organization, vol.21, no.3, pp. 142-160.
  • Syaebani, M. I. & Sobri, R. R. 2011, “Relationship between Organizational Justice Perception and Engagement in Deviant Workplace Behavior”, The South East Asian Journal Management, vol. 5, no. 1, pp.37-49.
  • Weatherbee, T. G. 2010, “Counterproductive Use of Technology at Work: Information & Communications Technologies and Cyberdeviancy”, Human Resource Management Review, vol.20, no. 1, pp.35-44.
  • Whitty, M. T. & Carr, A. N. 2006, “New Rules in the Workplace: Applying Object-Relations Theory to Explain Problem Internet and Email Behavior in the Workplace”, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.22, no. 2, pp. 235-250.
  • Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). Hane halkı Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanım Araştırması, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=21779 (Erişim Tarihi, 03 Haziran 2017).
  • Yavuz, E. 2010, “Kamu ve özel sektör çalışanlarının örgütsel adalet algılamaları üzerine bir karşılaştırma çalışması”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, vol.11, no.2, pp.302-312.
  • Yıldız H., Yıldız B. &Ateş H. 2015, “Sanal Kaytarma Davranışlarının Sergirilmesinde Örgütsel Adalet Algısının Rolü Var mıdır?”, Bilgi, Ekonomi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, vol.X , no.II, pp..55-66.
  • Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P. 2007, “Relationship between Organizational Justice and Cyberloafing in the Workplace: Has “Anomia” a Say in the Matter?”, CyberPsychology& Behavior, vol. 10(3), pp. 464-470.
  • Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P. & Melián-González, S. 2009, “The Role of Anomia on the Relationship between Organisational Justice Perceptions and Organisational Citizenship Online Behaviours, Journal of Information”, Communication and Ethics in Society , vol.7, no.1, pp. 72-85.
Toplam 29 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Ferda Alper Ay

Gulbahtiyar Demirel

Nuriye Erbas

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Eylül 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Alper Ay, F., Demirel, G., & Erbas, N. (2017). THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS. Research Journal of Business and Management, 4(3), 400-409. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.717
AMA Alper Ay F, Demirel G, Erbas N. THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS. RJBM. Eylül 2017;4(3):400-409. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.717
Chicago Alper Ay, Ferda, Gulbahtiyar Demirel, ve Nuriye Erbas. “THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS”. Research Journal of Business and Management 4, sy. 3 (Eylül 2017): 400-409. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.717.
EndNote Alper Ay F, Demirel G, Erbas N (01 Eylül 2017) THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS. Research Journal of Business and Management 4 3 400–409.
IEEE F. Alper Ay, G. Demirel, ve N. Erbas, “THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS”, RJBM, c. 4, sy. 3, ss. 400–409, 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.717.
ISNAD Alper Ay, Ferda vd. “THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS”. Research Journal of Business and Management 4/3 (Eylül 2017), 400-409. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.717.
JAMA Alper Ay F, Demirel G, Erbas N. THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS. RJBM. 2017;4:400–409.
MLA Alper Ay, Ferda vd. “THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS”. Research Journal of Business and Management, c. 4, sy. 3, 2017, ss. 400-9, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.717.
Vancouver Alper Ay F, Demirel G, Erbas N. THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS ON CYBER-LOAFING BEHAVİORS: A RESEARCH ON HEALTH WORKERS. RJBM. 2017;4(3):400-9.

Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.